Can I assume everyone commenting here has a WSJ subscription?
Can I assume everyone commenting here has a WSJ subscription?
Nope.
But you can assume more often than people on internet comment based on just reading headline / TLDR summary or maybe first paragraph and then jump on to commenting. And I may just do same as my apple news+ subscription expired last week. I didn't feel too motivated to pay increased monthly sub with no annual option to save a few bucks.
I was able to read it fine with the current version of the Bypass Paywalls chrome extension.
https://gitlab.com/magnolia1234/bypass-paywalls-chrome-clean
https://gitlab.com/magnolia1234/bypass-paywalls-firefox-clea...
Since I've been aware of this story for quite some time, the fact that it finally happened is all that really matters to me (which the headline covers, assuming it's correct). I probably know all the details already, unless something really unexpected happened.
There was a late addenda to the agreement; as a concession on behalf of Goldman Sachs, David Solomon agreed to DJ at Tim Cook’s eventual retirement party (for half of his normal fee).