- mastadon was too complex for normal people
- threads was scary, due to meta, and tried to bury discussions about anything controversial
- bluesky was unable to handle the load, and was trickling invite codes out very slowly.
Has anything changed?
- mastadon was too complex for normal people
- threads was scary, due to meta, and tried to bury discussions about anything controversial
- bluesky was unable to handle the load, and was trickling invite codes out very slowly.
Has anything changed?
- Threads has eased up on the burying controversial topics and threads thing. But it still has, overall, very low engagement and very poor discoverability. Plus, it forces you to attribute your Instagram account to your Threads account, which ruins anonymity for many normal users. A hallmark of what made Twitter attractive.
- I've never bothered with Bluesky so I have no clue how they're doing right now.
The pendulum seems to be swinging back from consolidated forums to fragmented ones, without much concern over whether the undelying platforms are still all being hosted by one entity or are technologically decentralized.
Threads is terrible. Not infeasible that it makes it eventually but it’s just so bad I can’t see how it’s a serious threat.
Bluesky feels very different, maybe like the early days of Twitter and seems to possibly be sanely architected as well as having decent “safety” tools. Seems to be growing. One to watch, and the most likely replacement candidate, but not there yet.
I also have one eye on Nostr and another on Discord, WhatsApp, and YouTube.
Most likely though, I think the new Twitter will be Twitter. It’s not going anywhere, that I can see.
I don’t entirely buy the “mastodon is too complex for normal people” thing; I follow lots of normal people on Mastodon. It is not all nerds.
The entire premise might be toast.
https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=today+5-y&q=bl...
https://www.similarweb.com/website/bsky.app/#traffic
If this holds true, it is a big win for interface over functionality and under-the-hood-technology.
Mastodon is based on a pretty good protocol (ActivityPub) and has many instances. But the usability is terrible. Bluesky on the other hand only has a single implementation and instance, and I find the protocol (The AT protocol) harder to grok. But the interface of the one instance is way better than any Mastodon instance I have seen.