Évariste Galois
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
I had an unpopular comment about not using your age to prop up your work (17 or 70, who cares) from what I can tell you were not considered a child prodigy or abnormally accomplished even back in the day for doing things in late teens and early twenties. Alexander the great did most of his conquering by 25. The concept if a teenager is very modern. After like 13 you were a man/woman as much as any other.
He was involved in the July revolution of 1830, which overthrew Charles X and put Louis-Philippe on the throne (though Galois was a republican, and he did not do much). So he was part of a French Revolution, just not that of 1789.
Just said in fun, as wordplay. See below.
A pity he was killed. Who knows what other mathematical discoveries he might have made.
I studied group theory in school.It included groups, rings and fields. I liked the subject. It was fairly easy, and fun. Properties of addition of integers like commutativity and associativity descend from group theory, because integers form a group, IIRC. My math is rusty, so correct me, anyone.
I highly recommend the whole book as well, as well as his "Code Book".
Also I want to recommend Uncle Petros and Goldbach's Conjecture, another one of my favorite books.
Einstein gave us GR, yet lived a long life to be known for something he did in his much younger days.
I didn't know about that project, that's really cool! I'd be curious to know whether the person who devised this scheme was aware of structured meaning representations (UCCA, AMR, ...), and if so, why they chose to create a new meaning representation. Maybe the goals of the project and/or the constraints of Wikidata necessitated this.
Anyway, GUM (and its sister corpus EWT) does have a lot of parsed permissively-licensed text, so whoever's in charge should definitely consider using them. (Amir, the maintainer, is also super friendly and would respond to an email.)
Are descriptions for these available anywhere? (The articles on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Conceptual_Cognitive... and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Meaning_Representatio... are not very helpful.) I did find an interesting description of UMR https://github.com/umr4nlp/umr-guidelines/blob/master/guidel... , which looks like it might be intended as a generalization of AMR and quite in line w/ what the project is looking for.
UCCA: https://aclanthology.org/P13-1023.pdf
And yeah, you could consider UMR an improved version of AMR. AMR is often lampooned with the false name "American Meaning Representation", referring to its unapologetic focus on English only. UMR tries to undo this sin and has a lot of the same people behind it, as well as some new features such as document-level context.