Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

zer0c00ler

Wouldn't open source mean you can recreate the model from scratch by knowing the training data?

There is a weird definition of open source that creeps in here.

Llama2 is effectively, proprietary compiled software. GPT-4 is proprietary compiled and hosted as SaaS.

We have yet to see a true open source LLM...

AI/ML is reinventing so many terms it's a bit annoying.

View on HN

Quake is Open Source, Quake's data files are not. Llama2 is actually more open than Quake.

If we did have access to the training data wouldn’t all these organizations be sued for distributing copyright works?

It appears all my favorite books have been scanned by Open AI. I am assuming that they didn’t purchase them.

Library corpus sets must be available for purchase for research or machine learning. Is the only way to buy each individual books? People could go to the library to learn. ML should have the same opportunity.

I support Altman and his team showing up at the library. No argument there.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com