> i.e., output can't be reversed back to the input
But in the "Not good for" section it states the opposite: "[not good for] User IDs can be decoded, revealing user count" so it can be reversed?
But in the "Not good for" section it states the opposite: "[not good for] User IDs can be decoded, revealing user count" so it can be reversed?
>I appreciate that the author clearly states that security, (i.e., output can't be reversed back to the input), is a non-requirement.