Nowadays if you share or reproduce anything controversial, is as if you are endorsing such content. LLM's outputs are user generated content for what is worth it, both from inferece and from training. That line of thinking that the host would be responsible for everything it says, even if the users force it to, is ludicrous to me but it seems like how the world nowadays has become.
Take the headlines from when BingAI was acting-up, the level of anthromorphization of those applications were insane. I suppose they do it for the headlines, but people also falls on that and play along. If ChatGPT says something bad, is as if the CEO of OpenAI was saying it verbatin, period, and it blows back directly at the company. Take a look at the subreddit of ChatGPT and see how people act when it outputs something weird.
It saddens me that people lack common sense in such a way, and that's why we can't have nice things in the end. The companies also assumed the roles of babysitting the users, like a bunch of no-brainers. As long as online culture follow this, it will get worse.