You’re assuming your conclusion by saying AI is like a gun.
That’s not a rational argument for why we should be concerned — you merely asserted you were.
Why is catering to your feelings the default position?
That’s not a rational argument for why we should be concerned — you merely asserted you were.
Why is catering to your feelings the default position?
The fact is we don't know how current ML actually does what it does, we don't know what we'll have next month, and we wouldn't know how to recognize an AI or AGI if we developed one. The risks and unknowns are high, the default position should be to not develop the technology unless and until someone proves without reasonable doubt why we can and should do it, and how we'll do it safely.