Classnames – a site that provides thematically grouped lists of words
classnames.paulrobertlloyd.com
classnames.paulrobertlloyd.com
I think it sort of branches out in three directions:
- state (all statuses at a single moment)
- gamut (a range of possible (mutually exclusive?) statuses)
- story (all statuses for a single object)
I'm not sure what's the use of such thoughts, but my mind enjoys thinking them: words as elements in a topological space.
I suppose it's handy for naming variables, but my coworkers don't typically like the names I come up with. I had a dict mapping strings to size-limited deques containing timestamps the other day which I called an AmnesicChronology. Didn't survive review.
While the site is neat, the headline reads like a total failure to me.
Thanks for the tip.
However, 209kb of javascript? I'm no JS snob, but goodness gracious what in the world?
It's a collection of hyperlinks and a spash of CSS. And it's actually fairly sluggish.
That being said, the site feels instantaneous to me, and scores 95/100 on PageSpeed Insights, with the only oversight being the render-blocking Google font which adds 750ms to initial render, but should be cached on subsequent navigations. Perhaps your browser isn't caching it, which would explain the sluggishness.
200kB of JavaScript (50kB gzipped) is pretty lean for modern websites. React.js on its own is around 130kB, for just the library.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontology_(information_scienc...
My feel for the words is that any ontology which uses a tree to organize its names and defines no relationships between those objects is a taxonomy, but some ontologies do more.
I'm leaning towards ontology here because inferior and superior are not presented as mere subtaxa of the genus "ferior", but as opposites. I don't think taxonomy does opposites.
Much of the website goes into pedantic levels of obscurity, e.g. undecuple most people would have to look that up and its prone to mis-spelling.
Other parts of the website are naïvely over-simplified. For example an animal apparently only has a head, foot and tail.
Sadly the website reads similarly to journalists who write articles in the company of a thesaurus, thinking they can sound smart just by looking up an alternative more obscure option in the thesaurus.