This reminds me of one of my favorite articles: https://kieranhealy.org/blog/archives/2013/06/09/using-metad...
This is a great article to share with friends who don't understand how dangerous this is.
This is a great article to share with friends who don't understand how dangerous this is.
And you think people will be upset about the concept?
This is a poor example to use.
edit: I see lots of downvoting, but people... be realistic. The average person will only see that a rebellion could be stopped. This isn't an example which explains negative outcomes to them well.
People will give up all due to fear. Hell, people will give up all privacy to Google for beads and trinkets!
And this example shows a government being able to thrwart an actual, violent rebellion! The average Sally and Joe will think "great"!
I think you underestimate the American investment in our founding myths/stories. This is probably a bad example to convince an English person, but I imagine it would have considerable visceral appeal to an American.
"Metadata is information about information. A library’s card catalogue is an example of metadata: it contains details about the library’s books, which themselves are treasure troves of information. Metadata about a phone call can include: who called whom, what date and time the call was placed, each party’s location, and the call’s duration. ...
"Had such metadata been available to the Third Reich, it is easy to imagine that Kelly would have been flagged by encoding 3 (homosexual) on a punched card, arrested, and his death recorded by encoding 4 (execution), having been found guilty by association. There are other explanations for Kelly’s actions that, knowing the conversations’ contents, would lead to completely different interpretations."