And energy is quadratic with respect to velocity. Going 90->105 is worse than 30->45. The only difference is that a 30 zone is usually a densely populated area, so the risks are different.
I'm not sure where you are, but from my driving elsewhere, it appears similar in Sweden (only the posted speeds are higher), and worse in Spain & Italy.
And energy is quadratic with respect to velocity. Going 90->105 is worse than 30->45.
Since the speed delta is the same it's far worse with 30 to 45, and regulations reflect that.
> Since the speed delta is the same it's far worse with 30 to 45, and regulations reflect that.
If E(v) = mv²/2, then E(v+dv) = m(v+dv)²/2 = mv² + m v dv/2 + m dv²/2. As you can see, the middle term is proportional to v, the initial speed. Kinetic energy does increase more going 90->105 than 30->45.
Maybe this is too abstract, so he're a concrete example. Let's assume a vehicle weighing 1 ton (1000 kg).
* Going 30 km/h => kinetic energy is 34 kJ
* Going 45 km/h => kinetic energy is 78 kJ, so about 43 kJ more
* Going 90 km/h => kinetic energy is 312 kJ
* Going 105 km/h => kinetic energy is 425 kJ, so about 113 kJ more
It's really basic physics.