Practical solution. Fingerprint the conversations and images. Do something naughty, go to jail.
Practical solution. Fingerprint the conversations and images. Do something naughty, go to jail.
So is what you’re asking for? That level of security around AI usage?
Arguing that these things are primarily in the interest of safety is tenuous at best. A fitting parallel for the levels of risk that chatbots present.
The world is about shades of gray and (typically) minimising harm. We all know people fully bent on doing antisocial things will likely get there, one way or the other, but we still try to make it hard for them. That's why professional locksmiths typically have to register with the police, you can't buy all medicines over the counter, etc etc.
With this view, reducing access to information that is useful almost exclusively when committing crimes, is absolutely fair. It will not solve all problems but it will make it a bit harder to do bad stuff.
The safest way to handle large language models is simply to have a more illiterate society.
It is disgusting people would talk about destroying data centers when we have such safer options like this.