If he cares more about the company culture than being rehired by the people that disagree with his outlook, why not let it fly? If it instigates a culture change, he wins at the cost of a professional bridge he doesn't value anyway.
If he cares more about the company culture than being rehired by the people that disagree with his outlook, why not let it fly? If it instigates a culture change, he wins at the cost of a professional bridge he doesn't value anyway.
I'm not saying that will happen here, but if I were writing this blog post I would have deliberately avoided specifics like this because of that, in part.
It's one thing to legitimately trash Sundar Pichai; another to name some middle-level manager like that.
You wrote Since when is a VP middle-level management ? in reply to the parent commenter's observation It's one thing to legitimately trash Sundar Pichai; another to name some middle-level manager like that. A VP is very much middle-level management.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_title#Middle_managem...
(a quick look at a Google org chart makes it look like, well, VPs are middle management there too)
It's not quite picking on a potential c-suite executive, but it's close. She's two steps away from c-suite, in a company of >180k people.
The point is, you weren't the person who wrote this. And I'm glad someone did. We need a little more scrutiny on how given people run industry leading ships aground despite making more in a year than some people make their entire lives.