- having it generate an outline
- have multiple clones write each section of the outline
- a stage which synthesizes the parallel-written sections, capturing the best
- a stage which combines all sections and ensures flow based on the original outline
- finally a stage which critiques and generates edits.
Iterate a couple times and you might actually have something good!
Basically a lot of what this article does, but automated.
If on the other hand your mission is to produce a proper creative writing work where the choice of words is the art, then if you don't do that yourself what's the point?
Why read Huckleberry Finn when you can read the cliffs notes?
Summarization is lossy, usually on the experiencing part.
The difference should be self-evident.
EDIT: In case it's not clear, No. I would rather read the shortest version possible than one fluffed up by AI to make a word count. As far as creative stuff goes, I'm not sure that I've seen a situation where AI made something interesting enough that I'd want to read extra words from it.
At least for 7B and 13B models I've found they give the initial outline and then stop following the instructions.