OpenAI Chief Scientist Has Been Making Strange Spiritual Claims
futurism.com
futurism.com
What's reported to me seem more awkward motivational speech attempts, or jokes, than rituals.
Ths is the Sutskever part:
> Anticipating the arrival of this all-powerful technology, Sutskever began to behave like a spiritual leader, three employees who worked with him told us. His constant, enthusiastic refrain was “feel the AGI,” a reference to the idea that the company was on the cusp of its ultimate goal. At OpenAI’s 2022 holiday party, held at the California Academy of Sciences, Sutskever led employees in a chant: “Feel the AGI! Feel the AGI!” The phrase itself was popular enough that OpenAI employees created a special “Feel the AGI” reaction emoji in Slack.
The more confident Sutskever grew about the power of OpenAI’s technology, the more he also allied himself with the existential-risk faction within the company. For a leadership offsite this year, according to two people familiar with the event, Sutskever commissioned a wooden effigy from a local artist that was intended to represent an “unaligned” AI—that is, one that does not meet a human’s objectives. He set it on fire to symbolize OpenAI’s commitment to its founding principles.
---
[1] https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2023/11/sam-a...
[2] https://web.archive.org/web/20231122062339/https://www.theat...
Also 'Feel the AGI'? Boooring. I would have been more impressed if they had gone in on 'Manifest the Basilisk'.
This is highly arguable. They're very popular with the tech crowd but I dispute that they're universally good. They seem to utterly destroy some people who come back from the trip as literal empty shells of themselves.
I played with ChatGPT maybe thirty or so times, when I discovered that it would reliably return nonsense and incorrect answers to simple questions I moved on from it.
I think anybody that engages with it at length and tries to have 'serious' conversations with it has... well, I don't want to use the word 'issues' but... issues.
“This tweet was posted against the advise of wiser colleagues”
This reads like some self-aware humor to me.
>The chief scientist even commissioned a wooden effigy to represent an "unaligned" AI that works against the interest of humanity, only to set it on fire.
I can kind of see what they mean, getting people invested in something through high energy group activities chanting slogans and burning effigies that represent the "bad, humanity killing AI" are tactics used to make sure everyone is thinking the same way and aligning with the "correct" goals. Feels similar to various cult-like crypto conferences and political rallies that mostly just stroke the egos of the people attending for being on the correct side/smart enough to invest.