Academic who has served on tenure-track hiring committees here.

At my (public) institution, none of these identities were discussed when considering candidates.

We did look at diversity statements as an indicator of if applicants were aware of the broadening participation requirements set by federal funding agencies.

As an aside, the experiences of the marginalized people you describe don't seem to indicate that there is a net advantage to them. I think anyone who was adopting an identity in bad faith would quickly discover that it wasn't as helpful as they thought.