>leave the beautiful and interesting diversity of life on earth alone
If you know of a way to make an AI of superhuman cognitive capabilities care even a tiny bit about beauty and the diversity of life, you should explain your proposal over on lesswrong.com and someone will pay you to work on it just like a multitude of funding sources have been paying alignment researchers for the last 20 years. So, far none of the lines of research resulting from this 20 years of funding looks promising.
>The existential doom scenarios are more like Pascal's wagers, that have to be given attention due to Bayesian thinking not allowing to assign 0 probability to anything
No, an AI's killing everybody is the outcome an informed person would naturally expect from the current deplorable situation in the AI field.