> "We know enough now to know that the “safety-focused nonprofit entity versus reckless profit entity“ narrative doesn’t hold up."
Why do you think that? It still strikes me as the most plausible explanation.
Why do you think that? It still strikes me as the most plausible explanation.
Not saying he couldn't change now but at least this is enough for him to give clear benefit of doubt unless board accuses him.
It’s weird how many people try to guess why they did what they did without paying any attention to what they actually say and don’t say.