Divide and Concur: A Radical Plan for Peace in Europe (1920)
publicdomainreview.org
publicdomainreview.org
Then, after a year or two, examined each as to how they allocated their reconstruction funds and established a functioning civil government. After two years, and if a grid "square" (doesn't HAVE to be a grid) is being heavily mismanaged, you pick one of the surrounding grids and pick the one with the best functioning civil governance, and give them control over THAT grid.
But far too late for that. Trillions of dollars evaporated. Of course our best potential ally, the Kurds, we didn't support enough. God we are so stupid.
It is radical, but if you drop the 'c' you've got a more descriptive title.
Sure, it seems like an insane plan, but just imagine being able to tour every major European region in a couple seconds. You could even do it over and over until you got dizzy.
Which?
> A Radial Plan for Peace in Europe
> A Radical Plan for Peae in Europe
> Divide and oncur: A Radical Plan for Peace in Europe (1920)
> Divide and Conur: A Radical Plan for Peace in Europe (1920)
Haha.
This is why academics and idealists must be mocked without regard when they come up with idiotisms like this.
They did that in Africa: they created some arbitrary country lines without regards for the local tribes. The results? Constant political fighting and wars because you now forced two tribes which hated each other with a force of a thousand suns into the same new country.
So it wasn't "left" vs "right" but "Triba A" vs "Tribe B". No chance they'd get togather or that people would move from triba A to B because of some "political" opinion. It was more like blood revenge.
The belief that you could force two hating cultures into loving each other because you draw up some arbitrary lines on the map and say "now get well together, children" is [redacted] to say the least.
How many multi-ethnic states were created by an outside power, from two or more warring ethnic groups? That was the argument put forth:
> > They did that in Africa: they created some arbitrary country lines without regards for the local tribes. The results? Constant political fighting and wars because you now forced two tribes which hated each other with a force of a thousand suns into the same new country.
...
> > The belief that you could force two hating cultures into loving each other because you draw up some arbitrary lines on the map and say "now get well together, children" is [redacted] to say the least.
It's a very old concept: "divide er impera".