But why editorialize the title to make it less descriptive? I could understand not adding that information if it wasn't there already, but it's in the article title.

Help me understand, what was gained by removing "co-founder and CEO"? The fact that readers can figure it out is not actually a statement of a benefit, it's merely an argument that the loss is bounded.

Given all the random, ish, folks leaving openAI at the same time, understanding the context immediately is beneficial. I assumed this was a flamey post by a rando, not dang.

So you go away from your own rules when it fits you... Usually you are more neutral