Let's say the 'replacement' dll file isn't very good at verification.
yeah, I was just curious if this was the whole security point in their software.
For now, Adobe is trying out (opt in basis) a more invasive kernel module.
That’s not likely to work out well for the Mac version with how Apple has been steadily working towards removing support for third party kernel extensions in macOS. I wonder what they’ll resort to after that comes to pass.