I wrote in June 2021 how Sam Altman's departure from YC had been under explored
twitter.com
twitter.com
An adjacent story had an interesting and tangentially relevant point as of today, though
> To understand the material world, you might study physics. To resolve those epistemic questions, you could turn to philosophers. For questions of the soul, you might ask a minister. But for these social questions in the short-term you’re basically stuck with journalists... > > ...We’re left trying to build a mental model for how the world works in this fog. In tech, we know very little about what leaders like Peter Thiel or Marc Andreessen are up to on a day-to-day basis. We get only snippets of their actual ideologies. Thiel famously hid the fact that he was funding the lawsuit to bring down Gawker! We learned about it because Ryan Mac and Matt Drange reported it.
https://www.newcomer.co/p/andreessen-horowitz-and-the-future
It was communicated that he'd be an advisor, but then he moved to OpenAI as CEO and that advisor role didnt materialize so later on someone from YC updated his Wiki page.
If the author feels it should have been looked into, perhaps they should have looked into it?
I’ve had the same frictions with everyone that’s ever worked with me as an executive, if I structured my organizations any differently I would have been out for the same reasons each time too, but other stakeholders never had that power
I assume you mean the OpenAI board's announcement, which is now at the top of HN?
https://openai.com/blog/openai-announces-leadership-transiti...
Note that the tweet under discussion in this thread is about Altman and YC.
Please for the love a deity stop!
I know from first hand experience that Sam always deals with people and business deals above board...even got first row seats to see how a real first rate pitch deck is created and pitched.
Rant mode off....