Microsoft support 'cracks' Windows for customer after activation fails
bleepingcomputer.com
bleepingcomputer.com
[0] https://www.theverge.com/2023/10/11/23913107/microsoft-windo...
[1] https://www.theverge.com/2023/11/15/23958751/microsoft-windo...
vs. a random .iso from some dodgy forum containing god knows what
https://www.stacksocial.com/sales/microsoft-windows-10-pro
These are some good deals from a Microsoft Partner.
Give Linux a shot. Mint is a good easy-going distro that debloats Ubuntu. They have a few different window managers they offer and all of them are pretty good. The defaults are sane and the whole thing is pretty easy to use.
Because Microsoft doesn't care if you crack it or pirate Windows anymore as Windows stopped being their main cash-cow a long time ago.
They know PC sales are slowly declining and that Windows is loosing marketshare to Mac and Linux in an already shrinking market, so they want as many people as possible to keep using Windows, regardless if you pay for it or not, as that way they maintain their OS monopoly and they can monetize users through ads and subscriptions anyway.
That's why they stopped enforcing DRM checks on pirated Windows keys, and even if you don't activate it, it still works fully functional, with just a watermark as the only deterrent, big whoop. Or if you want to be legit you can buy a 3 Euro gray-market CD-key online which also activates just fine.
So unless you're a business or a super ethical user, there's really no point in paying sticker price for Windows today when the alternative ways of getting it range from dirt cheap to free.
That has been the case for a long time. Here is a quotation from Bill Gates from 2007:
> "It's easier for our software to compete with Linux when there's piracy than when there's not," Gates says. "Are you kidding? You can get the real thing, and you get the same price."
https://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2007...
I might be reading a wee bit between the lines...
The biggest change I've seen is in the stackoverflow developer survey results and it was like a 10 percent difference over 5 years or something like that with the gain roughly split 50-50 between macOS and Linux
Then in the general population windows market share looks stable
I'd love to have a link that shows otherwise though, I've tried to find good data on this
Seems like current worldwide marketshare is just 63% for Windows and in the US it's closer to 55% because Macs and Chromebooks eat into that. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fR7KqCbnjfw
Where I work.
I would rather use the 8G macpro than my 16G windows for any task: 4Go for the ms bloat + 7 Go for vmmem, I'm very, very short on usable memory.
When you have computer issues in a corporate env, you make a ticket. Of course it does not help to solve the problem, but at least makes you feel better that you did everything you could.
Jump over to enterprise support and there's a good chance you'll get an FTE (or an FTE after demanding an escalation).
If there's no chiptune accompaniment, it's not a real crack
I'm honestly kind of impressed
Ouch. I'd rather pay the far, far lower price that major PC builders pay.
> The Microsoft support engineer in this case, ran the following PowerShell command on the customer's Windows PC [the Massgrave activate 1liner on Github]
It works as advertised btw.
Just having one thing on the internet be not-hostile or having something Microsoftish that isn't gaslighting me while being malicious and exploitive - that in itself is nearly a joy.
European Court of Justice has declared that it is legal and Microsoft has to accept it.
edit: removed "obtained in bulk"
https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/201...
Perhaps they were not bought in bulk then, I don't know.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/gamesblog/2012/jul/05...
Here's a Deloitte talk recommending businesses to buy used licenses: https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/pl/Documents/...
The Deloitte slides agree: “Licenses that were originally sold in a bundle cannot be sold separately.”
I assume the same/similar risk exists here for this user.
If you purchased the legal copy, and it doesn't work. Then a official agent uses a illegal copy and activates your account. Then you login to a microsoft account. Do you risk losing your entire account due to a TOS violation?
I'm still rocking a serial I used back in 2003 for an older machine I use for games and nostalgia.
EDIT: Whenever you see "Login with Facebook, Google, Github, .... or email [hidden away in smaller font]", always choose email.
Attempting to re-activate just gave me some weird technical error that Google, no shock, produced no useful results for after hours of searching, so I just used a crack and was fixed within minutes.
I hate this company and I am kicking past me who spent much of my early career gleefully switching hundreds of firms over to windows from Novell.
This is also the one used in TFA.