It’s not science.
After two decades, zero predictions of any phenomena in nature. Please correct me if I’m mistaken.
Performing a calculation that produces patterns that sort of resemble some natural forms is not a prediction of anything.
After two decades, zero predictions of any phenomena in nature. Please correct me if I’m mistaken.
Performing a calculation that produces patterns that sort of resemble some natural forms is not a prediction of anything.
It was interesting and one of the best explorations of automata that I've seen, but I don't think anyone could draw any conclusions from it.