How could an ai, programmed with the bias of people that already suck at predicting the weather, even get close to being accurate?
The ML algorithm doesn't care about the science, the agendas, the theories, nothing. It just looks for patterns in the data. Instead of an exact calculation it's more akin to numerical analysis. Turns out that looking at the whole in this case, is better than the sum of the parts.
It's the problem that's hard.