In the US we’re terrified to take away someone’s access to a car because there are so few valid alternatives in most of the country. To the point where driving tests are basically a rubber stamp, and re-tests are nonexistent.
Yes, they look similar to a driver's license card, but so what?
We have ID cards. We have driver's license cards. The latter is so ubiquitous that there's really no reason to require drivers to carry both. Just allow the second to be used as the first. AFAIK, in most states, they're both issued at the DMV (or your state's equivalent organization) anyways.
I'm just really struggling to see what you're trying to get at. Your question is posed in such a way that I'm interpreting it to be an attempt at some sort of "gotcha" question.
They did not. Cited, points, and I'm sure their insurance went up.
We got to fight with their insurance company to try to get enough money for another car and to cover medical expenses. That was fun.
Even though there was no contest that the other driver was at fault, I started driving with a 4K dashcam after that. And I found something interesting: I started driving more carefully myself because if there was an accident, I wanted the record to show I was blameless.
I drive a small BMW 2 series (M240i, not the M235i-based-on-mini-abomination).
I have seen entire civilizations disappear in my A-pillar. I need to look around it like an owl moves its head.
Interesting intersection that had this problem (now fixed).