What if climate change meant not doom – but abundance?
washingtonpost.com
washingtonpost.com
That is the wrong question... what if I lose? Even not having a clue of the science behind this predictions betting up to everything is not smart, or is plain criminal if you try to convince others.
It certainly will lead to abundance, after humanity has mostly wiped itself out, and the population is reduced to 1/10, the survivors will certainly have greater abundance.
If we had long term population control more intelligent than that of a fruitfly, we wouldn't be in this situation to start with...
But look here doctor, wouldn't this nucleus of survivors be so grief stricken and anguished that they'd, well, envy the dead?
STRANGELOVE
No sir... Right arm rolls his wheelchair backwards. Excuse me. Struggles with wayward right arm, ultimately subduing it with a beating from his left.
. . when... when they go down into the mine everyone . . would still be alive. There would be no shocking memories, and the prevailing emotion will be one of nostalgia for those left behind, combined with a spirit of bold curiosity for the adventure ahead! Ahhhh!
Right are reflexes into Nazi salute. He pulls it back into his lap and beats it again. Gloved hand attempts to strangle him.
If it happened slowly over 10,000 years then species would have time to migrate, adapt and evolve to handle the changes. So the good and bad changes would roughly balance, and a higher energy system could result in greater abundance.
But when it happens over a few decades?
Try to switch off Javascript.