Costly Cures: Harsh Treatments Appear to Uphold Social Trust
robkhenderson.com
robkhenderson.com
This alone is such a wildly unfounded statement. Maybe the author is a typical, academic soft body.
I couldn't really keep reading beyond this point as the author is comically uncritical of their own beliefs
Humans are wildly dangerous, vengeful, intelligent and resourceful.
We spend the beginning and end of our lives pathetic, weak and vulnerable. There is a limited window of time in which we are dangerous, vengeful, intelligent, and resourceful enough to be threatening.
We have no armor, no fur, no claws. We freeze to death in the cold and burn in the sun. We can't breathe underwater, nor can we fly. Being bipedal we can't hunt anything by chasing it and beating it to death; we leverage deception, surprise and traps and are quickly fucked when anything uses the same tactics on us.
We're good at leveraging technology. That's the only reason we're apex. If we can't exploit some other creature in time to adapt to the current situation, we're dead.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endurance_running_hypothesis [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persistence_hunting
> But the idea is a supposition. It was formulated as a way to explain characteristics humans possess. The best evidence for humans engaging in persistence hunting is merely that we have physical traits that suggest we could do so.
[0] https://undark.org/2019/10/03/persistent-myth-persistence-hu...
While some animals can run faster than humans, none of them can run for as long. That is exactly how we did it.