Is the error rate due to quantum tunneling at so many nanometers still a fundamental limit to transistor density and thus also (G)DDR and HBM performance per unit area, volume, and charge?
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38056088 ; a new QC and maybe in-RAM computing architecture like HBM-PM: maybe glass on quantum dots in synthetic DNA, and then still wave function storage and transmission; scale the quantum interconnect
Is melamine too slow for >= HBM RAM?
> Optical tweezers: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_tweezers
> "'Impossible' photonic breakthrough: scientist manipulate light at subwavelength scale" https://thedebrief.org/impossible-photonic-breakthrough-scie... :
>> But now, the researchers from Southampton, together with scientists from the universities of Dortmund and Regensburg in Germany, have successfully demonstrated that a beam of light can not only be confined to a spot that is 50 times smaller than its own wavelength but also “in a first of its kind” the spot can be moved by minuscule amounts at the point where the light is confined
FWIU, quantum tunneling is regarded as error to be eliminated in digital computers; but may be a sufficient quantum computing component: cause electron-electron wave function interaction and measure. But there is zero or 1 readout in adjacent RAM transistors. Lol "Rowhammer for qubits"