You'd definitely need a better poster child than sex work for that in the US. There's no way conservatives would vote for something with that as poster child and some democrats wouldn't either. The US as a whole regardless of team is pretty puritan.
Edit: Child evidently has a reading comprehension problem and didn't understand "don't have to be a puritan." The emphasis is on cyberpimps. Whether or not you approve of pornography or prostitution you can still find pimps, who are by nature exploitative, distasteful without being a puritan.
It’s the objection itself not the reason for it that’s important. In other words objecting to porn on artistic grounds is still puritan.
Ergo,
>objecting to porn on artistic grounds is still puritan.
is not true
It’s defining something as positive or negative which makes this a moral judgement not the specific value assigned.
I use positive/negative here because someone may believe there’s an incorrect solution to a math problem without judging such errors in terms of morality.