> Instagram team have been as successful had they chosen
> PHP? I think not.
Can you elaborate, why you think so? PHP worked OK for Facebook and Wikipedia. > Instagram team have been as successful had they chosen
> PHP? I think not.
Can you elaborate, why you think so? PHP worked OK for Facebook and Wikipedia.Facebook can afford to throw money at the problem and nobody's really trying to compete with Wikipedia so they can get away with it.
Facebook started with PHP they weren't always the massive company they are today and managed to displace other entrenched social networks.
> fighting with the language and coding around its
> deficiencies
That's still too vague. Sure PHP has it warts, but I don't recall anything I could call "fighting with the language".
Yep, stack/needle mess and inconsistency in naming is annoying, but not exactly a huge time waster.Aaah the good old circular reasoning of dismissing the big guy - they did get big enough to be able to afford money by using PHP too you know.
The idea that the server tier language has a direct effect on the user at the level of code quality we are discussing is naive at best and trollish at worst.
Give competent team A six months to build something in PHP and competent team B six months to build something in any of the better options and team B will build a better product every time.
Because I would imagine it depended a lot on the skill of the teams in question - and if evenly matched they would produce similar quality.