Given by today's standard, _most_ if not all the code I review out in the wild are these: - Search your question on $search_engine - Land to stackoverflow - Copy - Paste - Write some crappy unit test (important but still crappy IMHO) - CI - Boom land on production
Where is this special fairy of "overburden"'ed devs you speak of?
Very few code today are _true_ innovations. It's a pile of abstractions over abstraction shite.
And you can't find typical business rules on Stack Overflow. Getting this right is much harder than it sounds.
Fair dinkum. That's you. You may be biased towards it due to past experiences and I understand it. However, with that mentality where there are no "innovation"(s) involved, you'll only get donkeys that live within the echo chamber. And, may be that's what you want.
Heh. Thanks for raising. I am very well aware of it.
> Getting this right is much harder than it sounds.
Let's call a duck a duck. Unless, you tell me you are designing guidance system for NASA, I'd be happy to leave this pedantic discussion aside.