> because most regulation DOES harm and destroy market affects and competitive businesses

I don't see that as a problem, when the alternative seems to be essentially zero oversight over people who don't care if they -- through their own negligence -- release chemicals into the atmosphere that contribute to the destruction of our planet's biosphere.

"Business interests" are irrelevant if our planet becomes unlivable for humans.

Regardless:

> Simply saying "yeah it seems like New Mexico doin real good with more laws" is extremely dangerous

Is anyone actually saying that, though? Sounds like a straw man to me.