Interesting, but this seems like a low-quality source. The article implies that 47.5 + 5 = 100 and that one's wife's sister's wife could be one's brother-in-law. Odd.
The remaining 5% was split ammong two other women.
Now i know it's not low quality per se, but it's not journalism either.
It started pretty small, as a newsletter a guy wrote everyday during his commute.
He then quit his job to do this fulltime. I won't comment if this was a bad or good move. The quality hasnt decreased but thr newsletter is now filled with ads.
47.5 * 2 + 5 = 100