YouTube cares less for your privacy than its revenues
theregister.com
theregister.com
There, corrected the title for you.
Your privacy extends beyond what you personally expose, being aware of what others see and use your information for and how your information can be protected is how you maintain privacy. You can't fully avoid others keeping information about you online by not being online (banks, retail, flying, identity, tax information, pictures on facebook, school records, ...), but you can understand the evolution of systems that would use your personal information to decide on how you can obfuscate or limit sending information to maintain your privacy. Holding bad actors accountable for mishandling information isn't contradictory to trying to keep your privacy.
That’s how this argument sounds. Right along the argument that if your dont want your ip stolen dont put it online.
To prevent your IP from being stolen, place a condom over the Ethernet plug before inserting it into the jack.
If it has a ticker, you best believe you’re the product, whether you realize it or not.
If it has a ticker and the "product" is free, then you're the product.
But plenty of tech companies exist that make their money by charging for the actual product.
And how many of those STILL sell your data, even after paying them?