Microsoft buys Netscape patents from AOL as part of $1 billion deal
allthingsd.com
allthingsd.com
I get that they win litigation, but is even the loss of a lawsuit more costly than the amount spent on purchasing the patents? The most costly lawsuit loss I can recall was Microsoft's antitrust loss, which cost it 9 figures. But even so, that's a case where patents would not have helped. And if it costs more to buy the patents than they recoup with when they win, or do not lose, the suits, how does it make economic sense to buy them?
Then again, maybe they're considering it an investment in their ongoing campaign to extort the android ecosystem.
More likely, this is to strengthen their case in the mobile patent wars, given that every smartphone comes with a bundled browser. In particular, they have an ongoing dispute with Motorola.
Comment 1: "Microsoft's buying patents for a long-defunct browser demonstrates once again that these are solely legal weapons, not bits of useful knowledge to help make products."
Comment 2: "I don't know, maybe IE is just that far behind."