Why is "pineapple" in English "ananas" in other languages? (2013)
english.stackexchange.com
english.stackexchange.com
Almost every language that is not English? No.
The most common term is "ananas" or some close variation, from the extinct Old Tupi language of what is now Brazil, which was a common trade language in the region in the colonial period.
The next most common term is "piña/pineapple" or a close variation. (from Latin and, for those forms using some version of the "-apple" ending, Germanic roots: English, most regional forms of Spanish [but not all, because, well, Spanish][0], Japanese, Korean, Tagalog, and others)
There's also a smaller number of languages (but with lots of speakers, e.g., Mandarin!) that use their own words not closely resembling either.
[0] Yes, English is frequently like this, too.
Interestingly, in Brazilian Portuguese, it's "abacaxi" instead, from another indigenous language.
https://translate.google.com/?sl=auto&tl=ta&text=pineapple&o...
[1] https://zh.wiktionary.org/wiki/%E9%B3%B3%E6%A2%A8#_note-DJR-...
pynappel (Afrikaans)
paina (Hawaiian)
paynapul (Krio)
പൈനാപ്പിൾ (Malayalam)
piña (Quechua)
I'm sure there are many more...
(Actual for the other city: something more like loo-uh-ville.)
Is Portuguese your native language? I can’t see how one would pronounce abacaxi in a way that sounds like ananas.
At least for me the following are close phonetically in Portuguese: Abacaxi Anacaxi Ananaxi Ananashi Ananasi
Abacaxi is pronounced ah-bah-kah-SHEE, whereas ananás is pronounced ah-nah-NAHS (depending on the region, the tailing "s" takes the sound of "sh" which is slightly closer but still pretty far). Note that in Portuguese proper pronounciation of the tonic syllable is very important, and in this case the tonic gives each word a very distinct sound.
Edit: Of course, let’s not forget our Catalan (‘pinya’) and Welsh (‘pinafal’) friends.
Now, regarding usage, you're completely right. Nobody uses ananás; everybody says piña.
(Funny: When describing the ananás plant, the DRAE says about its fruit: "fruto grande en forma de piña".)
The entry for Ananas at https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ananas says it's used for the genus which includes pineapple.
The equivalent English word for the genus is Ananas - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ananas .
Read the answers and you'll see the claim is based on cherry-picking.
As my brother (archeologist/linguist, reads the latter) says:
"Take a time machine and travel to a market on the Indian subcontinent, a thousand years back. Ask a fruit vendor for ananāsa/anāsa. You will get a pineapple."
Edit: Pineapples were introduced to India by Portuguese in 1548 AD.
Edit: Kindly ignore the initial claim. It's BS. :) (the time machine claim would still hold though). The word comes from Portugese/Spanish, the origin is 'nanas' which the Tupi people in Brazil used [1]. So the actual origin is from the Tupi-Guarani linguistic families [2].
Describing this plant as a mix of a pine and an apple is a particularly poor choice having in mind that this is a monocot, thus neither directly related with coniferes nor with dicots. When we have yet a word that is unique, short and exclusive for a new type of organism, and everybody is familiar yet with the fruit and its peculiar flavor, adopting that word would be wise.
In the same way as calling a type of animal "Sengis" should be preferred over the old and more verbose "elephant-shrews". Specially after we discovered that they aren't related with shrews at all, and totally deserve its own unique name.
Of course tradition stands in the way, so I'm just digressing
https://youtu.be/MuiMBXmAAHA - yep still going strong..
So not only has English a word completely different from others, it also literally means another existing fruit!