In a cameras-everywhere culture, science fiction becomes reality (2015)
latimes.com
latimes.com
I’ve had coworkers casually and shamelessly pull up their living room camera for us all to see their spouse sitting on the couch in real time. I’ve been looked at like I have two heads when I say my partner and I don’t track each others’ location using Find My. These are all little erosions of personal autonomy that are kryptonite to me, but most people just don’t seem to see a problem with them. I don’t get it.
What the fuck ?!
Tomorrow's World Today is an odd place.
It is hotly debated whether the majority of these diagnoses (frequently relying on the sole observation of blood around the brain and behind the eyes in infants without any obvious explanation nor history of major trauma) represent actual cases of child abuse, or false allegations of abuse on infants suffering from undiagnosed rare diseases [2]. Legal and societal ramification of this controversy are unprecedented, with thousands of parents and caretakers emprisoned and as many children removed from their home.
The persons accused of shaking their baby because subdural and retinal hemorrhage were found are presumed guilty, and they have no way of proving their innocence, that is, that their baby was never shaken... UNLESS they're able to provide 24/7 footage of their infant (or at least, the few hours/days before the baby's sudden collapse).
I estimate that these events occur in 1 infant out of 3000 every year. I think we have the technology to generalize such recording systems dedicated to infants <12 months at a reasonable cost. With a few thousands systems in the US population for example, we'd have within a single year a few instances of babies collapsing (most often at home), brought to the hospital and presenting subdural and retinal hemorrhage with the videotaped proof of what happened before the collapse: abuse or no abuse. Whatever the cameras find out, this could be the final blow to this enduring controversy.
Of note, this recent article [3] showing exactly this, a history of short fall supposedly causing these injuries that was dismissed by doctors who usually believe short falls never cause them. Video footage obtained by the police actually proved the history of the short fall (the doctors thought it was an "outlier" though).
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37650402
[2] https://shakenbaby.science/
[3] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S10918...
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y9p1jWfzNrg
Imagine you are married for 20 years, and your wife remembers that 15 years ago, she was too tired to consent and you coerced her into sex. It would be great to have archival footage, that shows, she was the one who initiated on that day!
Or imagine you are a male teacher at school, and you do not record everything! Your life could be ruined so easily!
Running counter to that is my fear that such data could never be kept secure. I don't want it for that reason, and I question whether what I already have is a good idea.
I am also disturbed that corporations and law enforcement have a version of that panopticon for me that can only be used against me.
That is a nightmare world that I absolutely would not want to live in, right there.
I can't defend against every eventuality that may happen to me although I take mostly reasonable precautions. Which doesn't include recording everything 24/7.