[1] https://www.healthgrades.com/right-care/patient-advocate/the...
[1] https://www.healthgrades.com/right-care/patient-advocate/the...
Practically everything on that list is associated with diseases that become more prevalent with age. Hypothyroidism is no exception: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK279005/
So, basically, because fewer people drop dead in their 50s due to heart disease or cancer, we see way more prescriptions for chronic, systemic diseases from later in life. There is a high probability that anyone taking one of those drugs on the list is probably taking multiple drugs on that list.
I don't see a problem here.
If you want to claim a chemical basis, you're going to need to prove a much stronger correlation in the younger age cohorts. Since different places banned this at different times, you should see hypothyroidism drop at different times. Has that happened?
Obesity has been on the rise, especially in younger cohorts, and we know that all kinds of chronic illness is correlated with that.
And, as I pointed out, bans on these chemicals have been staggered. If the chemicals are causative, you should see it in the data.
HPV vaccine comes online--cervical cancer cases collapse in the cohort. HRT is abandoned--breast cancer cases decrease with a step function. etc.
These things are not invisible.
Not the case?