This reads like a lot of hand waving and talking in circles from someone who drank an extra pot of coffee.
People have been trying to suck functionality from the web into the browser since Netscape 4.5 at least. The devil is in the details.
This reads like a lot of hand waving and talking in circles from someone who drank an extra pot of coffee.
People have been trying to suck functionality from the web into the browser since Netscape 4.5 at least. The devil is in the details.
I disagree with “a good book is one that confirms what you already believe,” even if Willy Wonka writes it.
This reading seems too dismissive and simplistic, and not respectful of the people involved. At the base of the article:
Many thanks to the following excellent people (in alphabetical order) for their invaluable feedback: Amy Guy, Benjamin Goering, Ben Harnett, Blaine Cook, Boris Mann, Brian Kardell, Brooklyn Zelenka, Dave Justice, Dietrich Ayala, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux, Fabrice Desré, Ian Preston, Juan Caballero, Kjetil Kjernsmo, Marcin Rataj, Margaux Vitre, Maria Farrell, and Tess O'Connor. Needless to say, anything dumb and stupid in this article is entirely mine.
Is there a specific point you found circular or hand-wavy?
Based on my past experiences with other UX people who want me to live without a UI element that I'm attached to, I'd be willing to bet money that he's failed to understand something about how my brain actually works. And mocking people who might have my preference goes a long way to convincing me that he won't want to listen to why people like me don't want to use his version. Whatever it is. (He didn't make that clear.)
I agree with you the point about tabs comes across as insensitive and lacking in empathy for people who like tabs.
Take for example: For all users, tabs are the wrong answer to something people want to do: organise their information, even if it's just a small current stack of interactions
Criticism of tabs is warranted and it's worth exploring other solutions, but to pretend that tabs have no use cases, thereby seeming to suggest that anyone who likes them is "wrong" or, even "dumb", is difficult to support. This exaggeration makes the points less effective.
And mocking people who might have my preference goes a long way to convincing me that he won't want to listen to why people like me don't want to use his version
Totally agree.
I thought the article made good points, but often stated them poorly, diluted them with unwarranted insensitivity and hyperbole, and was hard to read.
You do NOT want tabs and you do NOT like them, but you do NOT know that. You just think you do. Open your mind up.
Fortunately, browsers can and do accommodate both of us. I hope they continue to do so.