For the creators who I do extract definitive value from (how-tos, DIY, teachers, etc), I'll donate directly or subscribe to a Patreon for a bit of time.
For the creators who I do extract definitive value from (how-tos, DIY, teachers, etc), I'll donate directly or subscribe to a Patreon for a bit of time.
There's a three way ecosystem: the content creator, Google and the consumer. Money can only enter the system through either ads or premium subscriptions.
* Patreon (already mentioned, money definitely enters the system through here)
* Sponsors (VPNs, CuriosityStream, Brilliant, etc.)
* Nebula (a premium subscription for a non-Google service)
* Merch companies
* Book sales
Google would love for you to think it's a three-way system and they're the one and only middle-man who can help you to fund creators you like, but it's completely and totally false. Pushing their monopolistic line as if it were the truth does nothing to help the creators, it only helps Google.
Sponsers = another word for advertisers
Nebula = consumer pays again (similar to yt premium)
The only exceptions are merch and book sales, which only a small amount of big YouTubers have access to.
Wouldn't it be nice if you could pay a monthly subscription, and any video you viewed gave the creators a small fraction?
> There's a three way ecosystem: the content creator, Google and the consumer.
Patreon is a different company than Google. So is Nebula. Sponsors pay the creator directly and don't go through Google.
> Wouldn't it be nice if you could pay a monthly subscription, and any video you viewed gave the creators a small fraction?
Yes, and I'm very happy with my Nebula subscription, thank you very much. It's nice to know that I'm contributing to creators without contributing to the centralization of the web.
But yes, I think we are in agreement overall. If the money can't flow in through ads, the consumers need to pay the platforms and creators directly.