> Except for the "tools to amplify factual voices"
They felt the need to include it, if they didn't I would agree with what they are trying to do. Why do they need to launder that line item with the rest?
They felt the need to include it, if they didn't I would agree with what they are trying to do. Why do they need to launder that line item with the rest?
This move seems to fit right in with the rest of Mozilla's program.Seems like a good move ... and the majority of people on the Fediverse seem likely to agree.
The whole idea of universal 'Truth' is a big part of most of our problems, yes. As the pre-Platonic Protagoras tried to assert, we need to temper our judgements by recognizing that different perspectives lead to relatively different conclusions.
Facts that all can observe and agree on are the basis of tolerance of interpretations we can't agree on. For millenia, some have insisted that they have been gifted with some ultimate truths. Nonsense. So yes, agreed-on, observed facts are the basis what we need more of, with other sorts of assertions carrying much less weight.