"another" is the weasel word
It implies this breach is the same as the previous breach, which it's not.
Ars has gone to shit over the last decade.
It implies this breach is the same as the previous breach, which it's not.
Ars has gone to shit over the last decade.
I won't disagree with opinion on the quality of Ars' reporting or this particular article, but I do disagree with the original comment's statement that "this had nothing to do with Okta".
The person you’re responding to is being obtuse to the point where it feels like trolling or contrarianism for the sake of contrarianism. Certainly a bad-faith argument.
I could have probably phrased this as "this had nothing to do with Okta's technology."