Hacker News Reader

Comment by ta1243 | Hacker News Reader

Trying high for that 2-nines reliability.

You just can't get that level of reliability if you do it yourself, no matter how hard you try.

We won't do it ourselves, but we also won't do it with a provider that has accumulated 50+ hours of downtime in less than a month all the while having no communication or support.

That's barely clearing the one nine availability for the last 30 days (93%) for our particular stack on CF, this is insane.

Mind you last time we were hit by a 22h outage on Oct. 9 we didn't get so much as an email from CF either during or after the outage.

The no communication or support is the real killer here, imo. I can understand them having some catastrophic issues which I would be reasonably confident they could fix, it’s the uncertainty of the situation that makes me worry. Is this so easy to fix it will be back in less than an hour and they will communicate then? Are they going dark and I need to find a new provider asap?

To be fair, their status page says emails don’t work haha

It's long been accepted practice in the hosting industry to have your critical communications as a provider (status page, support system) hosted somewhere that's not your network, for this reason.

It continues to amaze me how major infrastructure providers seem to consistently fuck this one up (see also: AWS' status page outage a while ago).

we used to joke that we had 5 8's of availability

Reply on news.ycombinator.com