Zephr plans to create a "networked GPS" using cell phones
techcrunch.com
techcrunch.com
Is this true? Not good enough for what? They say further down that gaming and rideshare companies are showing interest. So is that their customers? Embedding their technology into apps to better stalk 3rd party humans in the real world?
This seems to an outsider like an insignificant problem that only applies to the least scrupulous companies, but maybe I don't understand.
> Instead, their ground traces are asymmetrical figure-8 patterns (analemmas), designed to ensure that one is almost directly overhead (elevation 60° or more) over Japan at all times.
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasi-Zenith_Satellite_System
This is also partly why more GPS signals (L2C, L5) were added: multiple signals at different frequencies from the same satellite allow for detecting atmospheric and multi-path issues:
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPS_Block_III#New_navigation_s...
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPS_signals#Modernization_and_...
But then again, gaming and rideshare companies only care about users in cities, so I'm not sure what their interests are.
* Receivers in the metal-reinforced concrete canyons of a big city suffer from multi-path reflections of buildings, leading to bigger uncertainty. You can improve those signals with a (still pretty uncertain) rural reference. This reference typically also sees low angle satellites, and it receives all signals without reflections.
* You can improve the uncertainty of some of your references by running analysis on it's position history and compare it with (highly certain) map data. One of your rural signals is moving at 78 mph? High likelihood to be in the left lane on that highway. Moved with 30mph, now suddenly stopped? Waiting at that specific traffic light, probably first car.
With crosschecks between enough references, some averaging and smoothing, you can produce a usable reference. Add a couple of absolute references (no reason for the company to not have a fixed antenna in the 50 largest cities each), and you're competing with current commercial reference services.
It's also worth noting, that for many of the uncertainties of the GPS signal (satellite clock jitter, atmospheric conditions), you don't need to update your position delta every second. It's already an improvement if you get a good reference update every minute or so.
The whole reason technologies like DGPS work is because receivers in roughly the same location will have roughly the same offset. If you average out the stationary receivers, you will be left with a shared common drift - which can be corrected for. Slow-moving receivers probably don't affect the average too much, and you'd be able to filter them out over time as they'd have movement beyond the shared common drift.
Devices will enter the stationary set as they stop moving, and move out of it as they start moving again. Even someone stopped at a traffic light for a few dozen seconds might be able to contribute to it.
I could see Qualcomm buying the patents, if any, for beamforming 5GSA optimization.
If you have a dozen people trying to navigate the same neighborhood of Boston* on foot, they could all be using the same app, all sharing data with each other and all benefiting from that data.
Does phase data require holding the receiver still? Anytime I've seen a survey GPS receiver, the surveyors seem to leave it in the same spot for a few minutes.
*There's some loss of generality here. In a grid layout place like New York this would be unnecessary, but in a less dense place it would be unviable.
I've seen cases where inaccurate positioning of poles by just 60 centimeters is enough to make pole loading analysis fail a pole.
Or perhaps the goal is to use data from dual freq GPS receivers to helping out the continuing majority of single frequency receivers?
Or perhaps they are just leaning on fixed base stations in urban areas to "bootstrap" and focusing on the P2P aspect as marketing, plus a convenient permissions grab for backhauling personal location information.
The novel part seems to be that they think they can build a business selling correction data back to the customers who provided it to them, not having to rely on third-party fixed base stations or installing their own.
Maybe like a rake receiver / antenna diversity, they can compound the multiple measurements from GPS satellites to get improved location information.
That'd have been great 20 years ago, but now that the base stations are already there, what have you gained? Maybe some limited utility in remote places that normally don't see human activity that somehow have many people with cell phones show up, while needing high accuracy GPS and forgetting their tripod-mount base station at home – but beyond that?