The UX was quite different as it seemed the ambition. Pi.ai just seems like a fine tuned chatgpt that’s aimed at being “supportive,” no?
Like ChatGPT, sure, but Pi uses internally developed, novel language models, not OpenAI's.
Not clear to me what their main differentiating factor is there. Seems a lot like chatgpt but without any name brand recognition.
Experience wasn’t particularly helpful at helping me with problems.
Pi is less brainy and better at conversation, in my experience. It gets details wrong but I had a conversation with it for a couple hours without getting bored, while ChatGPT has the personality of an oyster. Pi's also pretty sycophantic, but somehow was also skeptical when I tried to lie to it, which was interesting.