I don't see how this would be relevant for a code model?
The code model isn't trained to retrieve papers/articles, it's meant to complete code. Whether or not you find hallucination in a unrelated task isn't particularly interesting.
The code model isn't trained to retrieve papers/articles, it's meant to complete code. Whether or not you find hallucination in a unrelated task isn't particularly interesting.
My friend, can you do me a favour and actually click the link and have a play with the app? If you do, you will discover that what you're dealing with there is an LLM. That's literally why it's being compared to other LLMs.
No idea what you were trying to achieve with this comment. "The code model isn't trained to retrieve articles." a) neither is any other LLM, what's your point? and b) the app on the other end of that URL retrieves articles - it's not even tangential to the app, it's key functionality.