Hacker News Reader

That conclusion is based on their benchmarks. I'm not interested in those. I'm interested in community benchmarks, like those we're seeing in the comments. Lo and behold, GPT-4 is still king. The claims of any company should be taken with exactly a pinch of salt.

View on HN

that benchmark(HumanEval) is some public benchmark built by others.

That kind of benchmark is a lot more reliable for models published before the benchmarks; models published afterwards have more opportunity to "study to the test". That's especially a concern when a company explicitly uses its score on that benchmark as a marketing point.

sure, but it is the best thing we have.

Well no we have the anecdotes of all the HN folks which I trust many, many times more than a benchmark.

lol, you can continue trusting anecdotes from internet. Industry prefers more scientific methods.

So Paul Graham posted that Phind is better and got absolutely destroyed in the comments

https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1719657855240815026

No, I do not take these benchmarks seriously and for good reason. They're benchmarks. The only thing that matters is the user's direct experience of the product. And Phind isn't there.

> got absolutely destroyed in the comments

by tweeter trolls?..

Reply on news.ycombinator.com