Y Combinator, will you marry me?
mottis.posterous.com
mottis.posterous.com
This made me smile ruefully as I plow through reading applications.
Actually very little has changed about the application process or what we look for.
How do you weigh references when reviewing an application?
Has there ever been an application that was accepted on the basis of a clever stunt or some other cunning?
References count for a lot if they're unequivocal and from people we respect, and hardly at all otherwise.
People try lots of stunts, but I don't think we've ever had our opinion influenced positively by one. Negatively, yes.
I´m curious for the next ideas. It might be just natural that a platform made by hackers for hackers shows examples of how people try to hack the system. The recent examples might not be the myth creators but the YC partners know better about funny application stories. They might just be afraid to share too many stories as they will create new “expectations of expectations” on side of the applicants.
Beyond the recommendation system and some metrics, I´m convinced that Y Combinator is always reaching out for new circles and creatives. Just because 6 degrees of separation (recommendation) can bite into your neck too.
(Read Levi Strauss on hot+cold societies and the meaning of artefacts and cultural institutions. This might sound farfetched but I think it´s worth reading in this context. )