'Homeland Security could inspect what enters the United States in cyberspace'
rt.com
rt.com
An alternative to legislation might be to spend money and effort on a programme teaching American firms how to implement modern security. But this kind of practical approach fails to open the channels required to snoop on the general public.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/03/opinion/how-china-steals-o...
<rant> My personal opinion is that RT is simply jazzy anti-American propaganda sold by Putin to the english speaking world. I do not think they are a legitimate news source. For a backup of my propaganda claim, please compare their coverage of the Occupy movement with Russian protests against Putin. </rant>
I have a really tough time believing anything they say, too.
I turned it on the other night because my conspiracy theorist loving buddy enjoys their programming apparently, and everything was "USA is bad because of this"... "USA doesn't do that right"...
I mentioned that you shouldn't believe everything the russian goverment says and said "buddy" literally flipped out. He accused me of attacking his character and intelligence. I'm half worried he has been brainwashed by that channel. He is usually a pretty easy going guy.
http://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-news-and-politics/90971/disi...
And, foreign costumers (e.g. from the EU) could enjoy better privacy protections if sites like Facebook become inaccessible.