Hacker News Reader

Evidence for the statement that being potentially misrepresentative of your output can be misleading to others and lead to an incorrect conclusion, or that misrepresentable conclusions can be used by deniers to field their viewpoints ...?

Is there a certain type of evidence that would placate your very specifically worded and anti-intellectually framed question?

View on HN

Evidence that a perfectly normal chart with clearly marked ranges "provides fodder for deniers".

I doubt climate deniers are specially aware of chart layout. Most have very little scientific education, unsurprisingly. But go ahead and prove me wrong.

> your very specifically worded and anti-intellectually framed question

Random insults now. Nice.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com